Opera Lafayette: From Violins to Opera, Cloaked in Romance

Opera Lafayette logo; courtesy of Opera Lafayette.

Opera Lafayette logo; courtesy of Opera Lafayette.

The romance of the Opera Lafayette story is very compelling.  There must be a play or movie there. The company was born out of “ambitious artistic inspirations” to find new ways to explore music of the past, spurred on by the rise of interest in period instruments in America.  These operas are typically forgotten works of French composers that once enjoyed considerable popularity and have now engaged the interest of Opera Lafayette in the company’s exploration of music from this period.  As with almost every small opera company, Opera Lafayette is led by a music professional who is dedicated to a specific mission and who has the charisma and connections to elicit the interest of other music professionals and garner support from donors.  In this case, Founder, Conductor and Artistic Director, Ryan Brown, a noted violinist himself, has this company focused on performing and recording 18th century French music and opera (occasionally spilling over into the 17th and 19th centuries), and successfully so since 1995.  One gets a sense of Mr. Brown as a real-life Ichabod Crane-type from the TV show, “Sleepy Hollow”, a character transported to present day who gives us glimpses of our not too distant history.  The company began as the Violins of Lafayette and was focused only on music.  Singing, dance, and semi-staged operas were added, and finally, fully-staged operas with orchestra, and the name was changed to Opera Lafayette for the 2001-2002 season. (Had the name been changed to the Voices of Lafayette, it might have been even more romantic, if less descriptive.)

There is also romance in the intellectual commitment of this group, which augurs well for the quality of its productions.  Each performance is preceded by a good deal of research.  Their retrospective on their first twenty years states: “Regarding the discovery and presentation of new repertoire, we have been lucky to be a stone’s throw from the extensive collections of the Library of Congress, to have generous colleagues in Europe who have made scores available to us, and to have the assistance of several distinguished musicologists and experts in the field, ... With their help, we have introduced multiple works from the traditions of the tragedie lyrique, the opera ballet, the pastorale, the drama giocoso, and the opera comique.”  Opera Lafayette’s mission also includes creating a recorded legacy of their explorations.  Starting in 2005, they now have eleven recordings published on the Naxos label.  I have sampled several of these, which can be streamed on Apple Music, and I can report that they are of exceptional quality and the music will find favor with most opera fans.

The company has added educational and outreach programs to its efforts to keep alive and explore the music from this period.  The Young Artist’s Program was begun in 2007-2008.  And they help make the fruits of their labors more accessible to audiences by performing in low cost venues to keep ticket prices less expensive.  Opera Lafayette productions are each presented once in DC and once in Manhattan.  They also made an invited presentation at the Opera Royal in France in 2012.

Opera Lafayette website banner with photos of past productions.  Jean Paul-Fouchécourt in Menu: Plaisir (Photo by Bruno Amsellem); Kimy McLaren in Into the Woods at Paris' Thêatre du Châtelet (Photo by Francois Guillot); and, Sherezade Panthaki…

Opera Lafayette website banner with photos of past productions.  Jean Paul-Fouchécourt in Menu: Plaisir (Photo by Bruno Amsellem); Kimy McLaren in Into the Woods at Paris' Thêatre du Châtelet (Photo by Francois Guillot); and, Sherezade Panthaki (Photo by David Fung).  Courtesy of Opera Lafayette.

What does Opera Lafayette have planned for us in its 2016-2017 season?

Feb 19, DC; Feb 23, NYC: Leonore, Ou L’Amour Conjugal; composer, Pierre Gaveaux, and librettist, Jean-Nicolas Bouilly

May 31, DC; June 2, NYC: Les Indes Galantes – Part IV; composer, Jean-Philippe Rameau, and librettist, Louis Fuzelier

Nowhere is romance more evident than in the program for 2016-2017.  Leonore, Ou L’Amour Conjugal (1798), translated Leonore, or Married Love is the story of a woman who takes life threatening risks to save her husband.  Composer Gaveaux utilizes the same libretto by Bouilly that was later used by three other composers to tell this story.  The last and most famous of these versions is the one by Beethoven, titled FidelioFidelio is the great maestro’s only opera.  It is based in part on the Gaveaux version, and actually, three versions by Beethoven titled Leonore were presented (each with a different overture) over a ten-year period before being resolved into Fidelio.  Opera fans in the mid-Atlantic region are presented with a rare opportunity.  The Washington Concert Opera is presenting Leonore by Beethovern, the earlier version of Fidelio, on March 5 in Lisner Auditorium (previously covered by OperaGene).  And for the hat trick, after hearing these productions, you can travel to the Met Opera in NYC to hear Fidelio, itself, offered from March 16 to April 8.  This juxtaposition of the Leonore versions probably happens less often than Haley’s Comet makes an appearance.  If you need more of an inducement to attend a performance of the Leonore story, let me add that the Opera Lafayette version occurs very close to St. Valentine’s Day.  So, why not get tickets for you and your sweetie, though only if you are serious about that particular sweetie, and see an opera about the power of marital love.  Bound to win you points.

Les Indes Galantes (1735), to be performed as a concert opera, only involves one composer, Rameau, but has its own complicated history. This opera has a prologue and four entrees (acts).  Opera Lafayette will present the Prologue and Entrée IV.  The complete opera underwent several iterations and different entrees were performed separately before the complete opera was presented.  Entrée IV is titled Les Sauvages (the Savages), not used for obvious reasons, I suspect, by Opera Lafayette.  Despite the threatening and racist title of its day, it is a multinational love story where a native American maiden has three suitors of different nationalities from whom she picks one, and according to the Opera Lafayette description,"all celebrate in “Forêts paisibles” (“Peaceful forests”), an idyllic depiction of diverse cultures living in harmony with nature and one another."  This may be why Rameau’s work is not performed more often today; unlike most operas, nobody is killed or forced to submit to an unwanted love.  Nevertheless, the opera became quite popular in its day.  It is worth noting that Rameau may be the most prolific and popular composer you never heard of.  The “New Penguin Opera Guide” devotes fifteen pages to Rameau’s work, including thirty-one entries.  The article also notes that an epitaph printed for Rameau on his death stated, “Here lies the God of Harmony.”  The Washington Post’s Anne Midgette calls Rameau, “one of the most important French composers, but you’re unlikely to see his work at the Washington National Opera or the Metropolitan Opera, compelling as much of his music may be.” He was one of the music theory experts of his day.  You can sample other work of Rameau on the Opera Lafayette Naxos CD by his name.

YouTube video excerpt from Opera Lafayette production of Rameau's opera-ballet Les Fetes de l'Hymen et de l'Amour, 2014-2015 season; also available on Opera Lafayette website:

Opera Lafayette productions have uniformly drawn praise over the years from area music critics, especially for performing important musical works that no one else is performing.  What they do pleases, and they do it exceedingly well.  This opera company appears to be a gem among those in the U.S. mid-Atlantic area, and adds a large dollop of romance to the rich Washington DC opera scene.  Tickets and information can be found at this link

Note: Opera Lafayette and the Washington Concert Opera are presenting a joint discussion of their two Leonore works in a free seminar in DC on January 26 (reservations required).

 

OperaGene Is Listed In Feedspot Blog’s Ranking of Top Opera Blogs and Websites

Feedspot Blog has posted their list of the “Top 25 Opera Blogs & Websites on the Web”.  OperaGene.com is listed at #7 in their ranking.  Feedspot states its criteria in deriving the rankings in its listing.  The blogs/websites on the list that I am familiar with are excellent.  However, I feel compelled to point out that there are many great web sites and blogs that are not listed in Feedspot Blog’s top twenty-five.  My list of recommended opera websites can be found on the Opera Info – Websites/Blogs page, and there are many excellent ones I could add to my list .  Nevertheless, I am certainly pleased to have OperaGene included in the Feedspot Blog ranking. 

 

What is “Mozart in the Jungle” about, really?

I binge watch “Mozart in the Jungle.”  Why do I do that?  What keeps me coming back for the next episode, the next season.  Season 3 recently became available.  According to most critics, it is a pleasant, but not a great television series in spite of its Golden Globe Award nominations this year and past wins.  For me that was sort of my response at the beginning.  Yet I did come back, and towards the end of Season One, I was returning regularly, regularly like every day.  What, you say, does this have to do with opera?  Hear me out.

“Mozart” is an Amazon TV series, so the access is on demand if you can receive Amazon streaming, and if you have Amazon Prime, the episodes are free.  Thus, I could watch all three seasons and thirty episodes in a row if I so desired, and if it was humanly possible.  It is probably possible since they are half hour episodes, but I do not recommend it.  My wife and I once watched all the episodes of “The Thorn Birds” (eleven hours, I think) on a Saturday, pausing only for bathroom breaks and for carting food from the kitchen to the bedroom. Great series, but we were literally ill and disoriented when they were over.  (By way of explanation, we were much younger then.)  But I digress.  Easy access for watching TV fits my schedule and is an inducement, but there are lots of programs now with these options using services such as Amazon, Netflix, Hulu, or Cable’s on demand feature.  Why my preferential response to “Mozart”?

First, what is “Mozart in the Jungle” about? Aye, there’s the rub.  Thank God, it’s not about crime, spying, monsters, or super powers; there is no violence.  On the surface the series is about the performers and staff of the New York Symphony Orchestra.  The writers/creators include director, Alex Timbers; actor, Jason Schwartzman; and writer/producer, Roman Coppola.  It is based on oboist Blair Tindall’s book, “Mozart in the Jungle: Sex, Drugs and Classical Music,” reportedly somewhat of a tell all about sex and drugs of young people trying to make it in the NY classical music scene.  “Mozart” does have its share of sex and drugs, but this is not the focus of the show. 

A distinguishing appeal of the show is that the series is about classical musicians, not rock and rollers. We get to see the backstage, human side of the nerds, maybe not nerds, but certainly nerd-like.  Another appeal of the show is the cast: Gael Garcia Bernal as the unconventional orchestra director, Rodgrigo; Bernadette Peters plays Gloria, the beleaguered orchestra manager, and Malcom McDowell as Thomas, the self-absorbed, outgoing orchestra director, bring a great deal of experience and comic touches to their roles, and an abundance of charm.  Lola Kirke as the young, aspiring oboe player, Hailey, and Saffron Burrows playing Cynthia as the worldly-wise cellist, add emotional depth.  Other excellent character actors add support to this exceptional cast, including Debra Monk as the reigning lead oboe, Betty, not about to relinquish her throne, and the entire cast demonstrates humanity and a camaraderie of purpose in their commitment to their art and the orchestra.  The repeating performers are frequently joined for an episode or two by acting and musical stars.  Season 3 begins with Monica Bellucci playing a Maria Callas-like diva who is joined in one episode by real life opera star Placido Domingo. See, I told you it was opera related, though I wish more episodes involved opera.

Mozart is quite funny, flavored by quirkiness.  Rodrigo frequently receives advice from classical music greats such as Mozart and Bach when no one else is around; these past masters offer chiding and cryptic advice.  It is also creative; one episode is presented as a documentary about the orchestra’s trip to perform at a prison, perhaps foreshadowing Joyce DiDonato’s recent performance at Sing Sing.  And it presents the all too real-life struggle between management and the orchestra members dealing with the financial pressures of keeping a non-self-sustaining enterprise such as an orchestra afloat.  Musicians must be paid and big donors must be found.  The series is not without criticisms.  Mostly these relate to failings to present musical elements correctly, such as how the actors hold their instruments.  Frequently doctors don’t like to watch medical dramas on TV.  I suspect the same would be true for many musicians and "Mozart", though I have read that for many it is a secret pleasure..

All true, but for me it comes down to this.  There are scenes in Mozart that stay with you: Rodrigo’s rejection by a tempestuous love who castigates him for any compromise with commercialism; Hailey’s attempt to play oboe with the Symphony before being ready and her initial success as a budding conductor; and every central player, one by one, subjugating their human failings to a higher calling, the performance of their art.  What Mozart is really about is heart touching moments that define what it means to be human and to bootstrap ourselves to a higher level.  It is unique in television in that it demonstrates the power of art as a higher calling. This certainly applies to opera. Watch it and support the arts.  For me, time and time again, it wins my heart.  And time and time again, I go back for my next dose.

Note to readers:  I prefer to adorn my text with photos when possible, but for this blog report I failed to find photos in the public domain or approved for the press.  I don't wish to violate anyone's copyright, so I will simply refer you to Google Images for photos and to the Internet Movie Database for episode summaries.

Reviews by critics can be found below in chronological order:

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/12/23/arts/television/amazons-mozart-in-the-jungle-with-backstage-drama.html

http://www.rollingstone.com/tv/features/inside-the-sex-and-drugs-of-mozart-in-the-jungle-20141222

http://www.npr.org/sections/deceptivecadence/2015/01/15/377232599/what-we-love-and-hate-about-mozart-in-the-jungle 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/style/wp/2015/12/30/mozart-in-the-jungle-finds-its-feet/?utm_term=.839403edcc53 

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2016/01/17/fashion/mozart-in-the-jungle-amazon-classical-musicians-speak.html 

http://www.indiewire.com/2016/12/mozart-in-the-jungle-season-3-review-gael-garcia-bernal-malcolm-mcdowell-venice-rikers-island-1201756284/ 

http://www.vulture.com/2017/01/mozart-in-the-jungle-gets-classical-music.html?mid=twitter-share-vulture