Opera: a whole other reality

I just finished reading “Musicophilia” by Oliver Sacks.  It is worth noting that the subtitle is “Tales of Music and the Brain.”  In this highly informative book, Sacks, a physician and neuroscientist, describes case after case where brain damage or disease has altered an individual’s perceptions and/or functional capabilities in significant ways, especially in relation to music.  After reading the book, I have both a greater appreciation for the influence of music on our brains and lives, and on the complexity involved in its processing.  Sacks quotes a letter in his book as saying, “I’ve read many times that music is a whole other reality.”  I am starting to understand this.  The book begins with the story of a man who had little interest in music.  However, after being struck by lightning, he developed a sudden craving for piano music.  He even taught himself to play piano and a major aspect of his life since has been composing music for the piano.  It reminded me ever so slightly of my own rather sudden conversion late in life to loving opera (no fireworks were involved).  Many of Dr. Sacks’ stories not only relate how changes in the brain wipe out functions, but also how they can give such patients new ones.  The principal, though not only, explanation appears to be that the brain has neurons that repress or modulate functions as well as neurons that activate functions.  So, damage to the brain for example can damage the repressor neurons and allow a new function to come to the fore.  This raises the exciting prospect that in the future we may be able to have more direct control in turning on functional capabilities that lie hidden in our brains.

Dr. Sacks also discusses cases where music allows access to parts of patient lives that have been lost to disease or injury.  Some patients with dementia can recall and play complete musical pieces, and some Parkinson’s patients can move smoothly, dancing to music; music is used as therapy in these cases.  It is clear that music has its own composition in our brains, separate from though connected to other types of intellectual, emotional, and motor functions.  It is a fascinating field of study.  In a very poignant chapter, Dr. Sacks discusses children who have Williams Syndrome.  Children borne with this syndrome face many physical and mental challenges in life.  Deficits in cognitive function are pronounced.  These children, however, typically are extremely loquacious and social, making friends readily.  They also are typically very attuned to music and often have musical gifts.  I found one child's story especially touching in that she loved storytelling as well as music and wanted “…a dramatic accompaniment of words and actions rather than “pure” music.”  That is a connection I can relate to.  These children live in their own realities, about which I am reluctant to make judgments.  Some of their abilities I envy.  Perhaps we who enjoy opera live in a communal reality, firmly supported by our brain structures, that links us to each other as well as satisfying our own individual needs. 

Reader comments encouraged

One purpose of OperaGene is to create a community of opera lovers.  Comments can enrich the experience for other readers and provide insight on improving the blog.  My feeling is, therefore, that comments to the blog posts and opportunities to submit suggestions are imperatives.  This is, however, daunting for two reasons: first, it potentially will be a good bit of work for me.  Second, a comments section is open to misuse and abuse.  Thus, I will screen submitted comments before posting them.  Disagreements and criticisms are welcome, but I will not post comments I consider inappropriate, primarily ones that are patently offensive, mean-spirited, or are spam.  My default position will be to post the comments.

I seek and encourage reader comments that provide opinions, information, and insight about opera.  There is much to share and learn about opera in general and about opera specifically in the mid-Atlantic region.  I also encourage comments that ask thought-provoking or information-seeking questions that other readers may respond to. Comments that simply offer praise without content such as good job or thank you, if there are any, will be appreciated but not posted.  In making comments, imagine you are having a conversation with friends who share your love of opera.  You are.

First, a positive message: No, No, and No

Is not opera really just for high brows and people who want to be identified as “cultured"?  Isn't opera just for rich people?  Don't you have to be musically-inclined to enjoy opera?  These questions touch on a lot of issues confronting opera today, but for this blog post let me just say the answer to all three questions is no.  I think a lot of people who don’t care for opera suspect that hardly anyone really likes opera and mainly they want to be seen with the wealthy, intellectual, artsy crowd that they believe attends opera performances.  Not true.  I listen to opera just about every time I am in my car and nobody but me knows what I am listening to.  To anyone attending opera for purposes of ego or networking, good luck to you and thanks for supporting the arts; I hope you do have things in your life you really enjoy.  But in my experience the applause at performances is genuine; certainly mine is.  And folks, the average opera fan really likes this stuff.  For me Anna Netrebko (did you see her in Macbeth?), Kathleen Battle (my personal favorite voice), Jonas Kaufman (a guy's tenor, maybe leading tenor today), and Luciano Pavarotti (the one and only, though only on recordings now) are right up their in terms of my enjoyment with Taylor Swift (today's luminary), Diana Ross (yesterday's luminary), Johnny Cash (I grew up in Georgia), and Eminem (everybody has a dark side).  Yes, I enjoy opera and pop music differently, but I enjoy both.  

Do you have to be rich to support an interest in opera?  No, you don’t.  You can come from any background or station in life and enjoy opera.  I recently had a young attendant at a McDonald’s drive through window ask me what I was listening to in my car.  He smiled; he liked it.  Opera connects with something in your soul that has nothing to do with how you earn your living.  But attending opera is not cheap either.  In “Opera for Dummies,” Pogue and Speck point out that opera is the plural of the Latin word, “opus” which means work; so opera means works, which they interpret as "the works."  With opera you get a plot, acting, singing by main characters and choruses, dancing, costumes, staging, and an orchestra all in one performance.  All the folks involved have to be paid a living wage; so opera productions are inherently expensive.  On the other hand, how cheap is your average concert or sporting event these days?  And your pursuit of any interest will be bounded by the funds and time available.  I plan to devote some effort in future blog posts to exploring the cheapest ways to take in opera in the mid-atlantic region.  And there is radio and a wealth now of recorded opera and dvds and public television and youtube.  We’ll explore those also, but there is nothing like live opera!

Do you have to have musical ability or training to enjoy opera?  No, you don’t.  If you did, I wouldn't have gone near it.  But learning more about any topic can increase your appreciation and enjoyment of it. We’ll explore that too.

Don't let a perceived elitism or hoity-toity of opera scare you off.  Bottom line is that if you like it, great.  If you don’t, then pursue the interests you do like.  But I urge you give opera a chance.  Listen to some.  Attend one.  If it doesn't take the first try, give it another shot or two down the road.  It might grow on you, or you might find that it is just your thing.  You, too, might have the opera gene, waiting to blossom.  Then you can get down with "just folks" like me and groove on opera.